Why so cynical?: asymmetric feedback underlies misguided skepticism regarding the trustworthiness of others.
نویسندگان
چکیده
People tend to grossly underestimate the trustworthiness of other people. We tested whether this cynicism grows out of an asymmetry in the feedback people receive when they decide to trust others. When people trust others, they painfully learn when other people prove to be untrustworthy; however, when people refrain from trusting others, they fail to learn of instances when the other person would have honored their trust. Participants saw short videos of other people and had to decide whether to trust each person in an economic game. Participants overall underestimated the trustworthiness of the people they viewed, regardless of whether they were given financial incentives to provide accurate estimates. However, people who received symmetric feedback about the trustworthiness of others (i.e., who received feedback regardless of their own decision to trust) exhibited reduced cynicism relative to those who received no feedback or asymmetric feedback (i.e., who received feedback only after they trusted the other person).
منابع مشابه
Reporting dream experience: Why (not) to be skeptical about dream reports
Are dreams subjective experiences during sleep? Is it like something to dream, or is it only like something to remember dreams after awakening? Specifically, can dream reports be trusted to reveal what it is like to dream, and should they count as evidence for saying that dreams are conscious experiences at all? The goal of this article is to investigate the relationship between dreaming, dream...
متن کاملVictimization experiences and the stabilization of victim sensitivity
People reliably differ in the extent to which they are sensitive to being victimized by others. Importantly, "victim sensitivity" predicts how people behave in social dilemma situations: Victim-sensitive individuals are less likely to trust others and more likely to behave uncooperatively-especially in socially uncertain situations. This pattern can be explained with the sensitivity to mean int...
متن کاملTrustworthiness in Computer-mediated Transactions: a Content Analysis of Trustor Feedback
Internet-based information technology enables impromptu, virtually anonymous interactions between geographically dispersed, diverse others that is an order of magnitude larger than any preceding information technology. With this increased networking capability comes increased risk and uncertainty. We conducted a content analysis to identify what trustors in peer-to-peer computermediated transac...
متن کاملAn Elaboration Account of Insight
In this paper we discuss an elaboration account of insight that provides answers to two of the main questions regarding insight problem solving: why insight problems are so difficult for humans and why insight is so rapid in nature. We claim that the difficulty in insight problems is due to misguided heuristic search and that this difficulty is overcome using a reformulation mechanism. Furtherm...
متن کاملCausality and dispersion : a reply to
Classical dispersion relations are derived from a time-asymmetric constraint. I argue that the standard causal interpretation of this constraint plays a scientifically legitimate role in dispersion theory, and hence provides a counterexample to the causal skepticism advanced by John Norton and others. Norton ([???]) argues that the causal interpretation of the time-asymmetric constraint is an e...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Psychological science
دوره 21 2 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2010